This site is intended for UK healthcare professionals
Medscape UK Univadis Logo
Medscape UK Univadis Logo
Clinical Summary

Emergency cholecystectomy: extended vs no postoperative antibiotics

Takeaway

  • This meta-analysis suggests that extended postoperative antibiotic therapy vs no postoperative antibiotic therapy is not associated with improved postoperative infectious or non-infectious outcomes in patients with mild or moderate acute calculous cholecystitis undergoing emergency cholecystectomy.

Why this matters

  • Findings suggest that postoperative antibiotics should not be routinely used and should be preserved only for selected cases.

Study design

  • Four randomised controlled trials involving 953 patients met eligibility criteria after a search on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.
  • Primary outcome: postoperative infectious complications and surgical site infections (SSIs).
  • Funding: None disclosed.

Key results

  • Baseline characteristics were comparable in the extended antibiotic group and no antibiotic group.
  • Mean operative time was longer in the extended antibiotic group (79.9 vs 72.3; mean difference [MD], 5.40; 95% CI, 1.80-9.01; P=.003).
  • No difference was observed between the two groups in:
    • postoperative infectious complications (OR, 0.94; P=.79)
    • SSIs (OR, 1.13; P=.72)
    • postoperative morbidity (OR, 0.93; P=.70)
    • postoperative non-infectious complications (OR, 0.85; P=.57)
    • urinary tract infections (OR, 0.69; P=.55)
    • pneumonia (OR, 0.33; P=.14)
    • length of hospital stay (MD, 0.78; P=.25)
    • postoperative mortality (risk difference, −0.00; P=.65) and
    • need for readmission (OR, 0.87; P=.70).

Limitations

  • Small number of studies

References


YOU MAY ALSO LIKE