Esophageal cancer: hybrid surgical technique found safer

  • Mariette C & al.
  • N Engl J Med
  • 10 Jan 2019

  • curated by Jim Kling
  • Univadis Clinical Summaries
Access to the full content of this site is available only to registered healthcare professionals. Access to the full content of this site is available only to registered healthcare professionals.

Takeaway

  • In esophageal cancer in the middle or lower third of the esophagus, a hybrid, minimally invasive esophagectomy technique decreases morbidity while achieving similar efficacy to open esophagectomy.
  • The technique combines a laparoscopic abdominal phase and an open thoracotomy, which has the potential to reduce pulmonary complications and tumor spillage, and to be more reproducible.

Why this matters

  • It is unclear whether the greatest benefit of minimally invasive surgery stems from the abdominal or the thoracic surgical stage.

Study design

  • 207 patients undergoing esophagectomy by an abdominal and right thoracic approach (Ivor-Lewis procedure) from 13 centers in France were randomly assigned to undergo hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy or open esophagectomy.
  • Funding: French National Cancer Institute.

Key results

  • After adjustment for a range of factors, the hybrid procedure was associated with a lower risk of major intraoperative and 30-day postoperative complications (adjusted OR, 0.23; P<.001>
  • The hybrid procedure was associated with a lower risk of 30-day postoperative pulmonary complications (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.26-0.96).
  • 5-year OS favored hybrid vs open: 60% vs 40% (HR for death, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.44-1.01).
  • There was no between-group difference in disease-free survival.

Limitations

  • French population.
  • Surgeons were experienced.

Please confirm your acceptance

To gain full access to GPnotebook please confirm:

By submitting here you confirm that you have accepted Terms of Use and Privacy Policy of GPnotebook.

Submit