Takeaway
- This meta-analysis provides insufficient evidence for inositols to change ovarian reserve markers and to support their use in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) as pre-treatment before in-vitro fertilisation (IVF)/intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
Why this matters
- Inositols have been reported to alter folliculogenesis and the functional ovarian reserve, with benefits to reproductive outcomes after IVF/ICSI treatment.
- However, published literature is not able to provide definitive evidence of its efficacy.
Study design
- Meta-analysis of 18 trials involving women with PCOS.
- Primary outcome: change in anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC).
- Secondary outcome: number of retrieved oocytes, number of mature (metaphase II) oocytes, number of top-grade embryos, pregnancy rate, live birth rate and risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).
- Funding: None.
Key results
- Data for primary outcome were unsuitable for meta-analysis with unreliable direction or size of effect for a change in AMH or AFC after treatment with myo-inositol and di-chiro-inositol.
- No significant difference was found for secondary outcomes between inositol and control groups for any outcome:
- number of oocytes (mean difference [MD], −0.39; 95% CI, −1.11 to 0.33),
- number of metaphase II oocytes (MD, 0.29; 95% CI, −0.83 to 1.40),
- number of top-grade embryos (risk ratio [RR], 1.02; 95% CI, 0.93-1.12),
- clinical pregnancy rate (RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.87-1.53), and
- risk of OHSS (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.39-1.37).
Limitations
- High heterogeneity of the study.
- Variation in dose and duration of inositol.
Only healthcare professionals with a Univadis account have access to this article.
You have reached your limit of complementary articles
Free Sign Up Available exclusively to healthcare professionals