This site is intended for UK healthcare professionals
Medscape UK Univadis Logo
Medscape UK Univadis Logo
Clinical Summary

T2D: once-weekly semaglutide vs once-daily liraglutide

Takeaway

  • In patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (T2D) on 1-3 oral anti-diabetic drugs (OADs), once-weekly (OW) semaglutide 1.0 mg was superior to once-daily liraglutide 1.2 mg in improving glycaemic control and reducing body weight.

Why this matters

  • The efficacy and safety of OW semaglutide have been investigated in the SUSTAIN phase 3 clinical trial programme across the continuum of care in patients with T2D.
  • In line with findings of the LEADER trial, the SUSTAIN 6 trial showed that semaglutide significantly reduced the risk for major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events compared with placebo in patients with T2D and high CV risk.

Study design

  • SUSTAIN 10 study of 569 patients with T2D on 1-3 OADs who were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive subcutaneous OW semaglutide 1.0 mg (n=287) or once-daily liraglutide 1.2 mg (n=282).
  • Main outcomes: changes in haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and body weight from baseline to 30 weeks.
  • Funding: Novo Nordisk.

Key results

  • At 30 weeks, semaglutide was superior to liraglutide in reducing mean:
    • HbA1c level (estimated treatment difference [ETD], −0.69%; 95% CI, −0.82 to −0.56).
    • body weight (ETD, −3.83 kg; 95% CI, −4.57 to −3.09; P<.0001 for both).
  • A greater proportion of patients achieved HbA1c level <7.0% and ≤6.5%, weight loss of ≥5% and ≥10% and a composite endpoint of HbA1c <7.0% without severe or blood glucose-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia and weight gain with semaglutide vs liraglutide (P<.0001 for all).
  • Both treatments had similar safety profiles, except for most frequent gastrointestinal disorders (43.9% vs 38.3%) and adverse events leading to premature treatment discontinuation (11.4% vs 6.6%) with semaglutide vs liraglutide.

Limitations

  • Open-label design.
  • Short-duration trial.

References


YOU MAY ALSO LIKE