HIV: is 95% adherence essential for viral suppression? Not for single-pill regimens

Access to the full content of this site is available only to registered healthcare professionals. Access to the full content of this site is available only to registered healthcare professionals.

Takeaway

  • Reaching the 95% or more adherence threshold is less important for patients with HIV receiving single-tablet regimens (STRs) than for multiple-tablet regimens (MTRs).

Why this matters                                                                             

  • Poor adherence is associated with antiretroviral therapy (ART) resistance, progression to AIDS, and transmission of the virus.

Key results

  • Viral suppression was statistically similar between STR participants with 80%-94% adherence.
  • STR participants were 2.57-fold more likely to be virally suppressed with >95% adherences vs <80% adherence.
  • OR was 6.89 for MTR participants with >95% adherence vs 85%-89% adherence.
  • MTR participants were 7.61-fold as likely to be virally suppressed at >95% adherence vs 80%-84% adherence.
  • MTR participants were more than 10-fold as likely to be virally suppressed if they were >95% adherent vs <80% adherent.

Study design

  • Retrospective cohort study.
  • 1536 patients receiving STR or MTR ART were included.
  • Funding: None.

Limitations

  • Only 477 participants received STR ART, limiting the power of these findings.
  • Adherence was measured by prescriptions filled.
  • Primary patient population was middle-aged and African American.