Ondansetron use during pregnancy does not appear to increase congenital malformations risk

  • Kaplan YC & al.
  • Reprod Toxicol
  • 5 Mar 2019

  • curated by Sarfaroj Khan
  • UK Clinical Digest
Access to the full content of this site is available only to registered healthcare professionals. Access to the full content of this site is available only to registered healthcare professionals.

Takeaway

  • This meta-analysis suggests that ondansetron use during pregnancy is not associated with an increased rate of overall major congenital malformations, heart defects, orofacial clefts, genitourinary malformations and hypospadias.

Why this matters

  • Current nausea and vomiting of pregnancy treatment guidelines suggest that ondansetron may be considered if first-line drugs fail to suppress maternal symptoms.
  • Studies investigating the safety of maternal ondansetron use have reported inconsistent findings.

Study design

  • Six studies involving 3914 ondansetron-exposed infants and 1,563,139 healthy control individuals met eligibility criteria after a search across electronic databases.
  • Primary outcome: risk for overall major congenital malformations.
  • Secondary outcome: risk for heart defects, orofacial clefts, isolated cleft palate, genitourinary malformations and hypospadias.
  • Funding: None.

Key results

  • Ondansetron use during pregnancy was not associated with a significantly increased risk for overall major congenital malformations vs control group (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.92-1.45).
  • Compared with the control group, ondansetron group did not show significant increased risk for:
    • heart defects (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.90-1.77);
    • orofacial clefts (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.32-2.50);
    • isolated cleft palate (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.43-2.97);
    • genitourinary malformations (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.89-2.69);
    • hypospadias (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 0.69-3.75).

Limitations

  • Majority of the studies did not report data on exposure time windows, dose and duration.
  • Characteristics of the control groups widely differed between studies.

Please confirm your acceptance

To gain full access to GPnotebook please confirm:

By submitting here you confirm that you have accepted Terms of Use and Privacy Policy of GPnotebook.

Submit